Key Takeaways
- State unemployment insurance (UI) systems are being modernized after the pandemic exposed outdated technology, weak identity verification, and widespread fraud.
- Modernization efforts include replacing decades-old systems, connecting state and federal data to catch errors, and making claims faster and easier. The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has released open-source claim application code that states can adapt.
- In June 2026, DOL warned the governors of 53 states and territories to act on UI fraud, saying it may withhold federal administrative funds from states that don’t comply.
- The Unemployment Insurance Modernization and Recession Readiness Act, reintroduced by Democratic lawmakers in July 2025, would require states to offer at least 26 weeks of benefits, replace 75% of wages, cover part-time workers, and pay the first week of unemployment. It has not advanced past committee.
- Changes that expand eligibility or benefit amounts raise employer costs, and nonprofits that reimburse the state feel those increases directly.
- Fraud prevention matters to reimbursing employers too, since they are billed for improper claims charged to their accounts unless the claims are caught.
Unemployment insurance (UI) has been under heavy scrutiny since the COVID-19 pandemic, when state programs became a lifeline for the millions of people who temporarily or permanently lost their jobs. Although it was a critical support system, the pandemic stretched these programs to their limits, and in some cases they became a vehicle for fraud and improper payments. On top of that, UI is run jointly by the states and the federal government, so changes and updates can be sporadic and have uneven effects depending on each state’s population and local industries.
There’s been a multi-year effort to bring these systems up to the standards people now expect from digital services, including cloud-based platforms in the private sector. More and more services have moved online, but in many states, UI still lags behind. This effort to pay down “technical debt” and build a better-functioning UI system has led to significant changes across the country, particularly as states work to crack down on fraud and other costly errors.
Here’s where these efforts stand and why so many organizations are paying attention:
Modernization mandates
Modernization is one of the main watchwords in UI policy at the state and federal level, covering everything from how data is stored to how fraud is detected to how claimants are served online. Because technology changes quickly and public systems often take longer to update, UI modernization is better viewed as a continuous process than a fixed goal.
Some examples of modernization efforts include:
- Replacing older systems: UI, like most government systems, depends on complex identity verification and data storage. In many states, including California, much of this still runs on decades-old systems built on COBOL, a programming language that is difficult to update and that fewer engineers know. States are working to replace these systems, with the added challenge of keeping benefits flowing during the move.
- Integrating multiple systems: Another priority in some states is better integration between state and federal systems to catch errors, discrepancies, duplicate claims, and other issues. The pandemic was an unintended “stress test” that showed where data collection and verification fell short. Some of this work is shared: DOL developed a sample claim application and released its code as open source, and states such as New Jersey and Arkansas have adapted parts of it.
- UX and speed improvements: UI benefits help people cover costs after an unexpected job loss, which eases the knock-on problems of a sudden drop in income and makes it easier to find a new job. That makes speed and responsiveness key priorities for many states, since a missed or misdirected payment can mean someone missing rent, medical treatment, or other essentials.
Fraud detection
Reducing UI fraud is a priority of the current administration. In June 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) sent letters to the governors of 53 states and territories demanding immediate action on fraud and improper payments. DOL said it would use every available enforcement tool, including, for the first time, withholding federal administrative funds from states that fail to comply, and said more guidance would follow.
Earlier federal efforts took a more collaborative approach. A 2024 DOL guidance letter urged states to layer multiple anti-fraud strategies, verify identities based on risk, and use shared tools such as a multi-state data hub where participating states cross-check claims. Because each state runs its own system, with its own auditing, data storage, and identity verification, the weak spots fraudsters exploit can be unique to one state. That makes one-size-fits-all fixes difficult and explains why so much federal effort goes into shared resources.
Unemployment Insurance Modernization and Recession Readiness Act
In Congress, Democratic lawmakers led by Sens. Ron Wyden and Michael Bennet and Rep. Don Beyer reintroduced the Unemployment Insurance Modernization and Recession Readiness Act in July 2025. The bill would set new federal minimums for state programs: states would have to offer at least 26 weeks of benefits, replace 75% of workers’ wages, cover part-time workers, and pay benefits for the first week of unemployment, which many states currently treat as an unpaid “waiting week.” It would also expand extended benefits during periods of high unemployment and create a new allowance for job seekers not covered by state UI.
The bill has not advanced beyond committee, and an earlier version introduced in 2023 did not pass. Supporters say federal standards would fix the “patchwork” of state programs. Opponents of federal standards have generally argued that states should set their own benefit levels and that richer benefits raise costs for employers. Either way, the bill shows where part of the federal debate is headed.
Why organizations should watch UI changes
These efforts reflect broad agreement that the current UI system has shortcomings, along with real differences over how to fix them. Some, like modernization, will continue for years. For nonprofits, the stakes are concrete. Changes that expand eligibility, lengthen benefits, or raise benefit amounts increase the cost of claims. Employers that pay state unemployment tax tend to see that through higher rates over time, while 501(c)(3) organizations that reimburse the state for benefits paid to their former employees feel it directly, dollar for dollar.
Fraud prevention matters too. Reimbursing employers are billed for improper claims charged to their accounts unless the claims are caught, so responding promptly to state claim notices is worth the effort. Whether reimbursing makes financial sense for your organization depends on your state’s rules, your staffing, and how these changes play out.
About Us
For more than 40 years, 501(c) Services has been a leader in offering solutions for unemployment costs, claims management, and HR support to nonprofit organizations. Two of our most popular programs are the 501(c) Agencies Trust and 501(c) HR Services. We understand the importance of compliance and accuracy and are committed to providing our clients with customized plans that fit their needs.
Contact us today to see if your organization could benefit from our services.
Are you already working with us and need assistance with an HR or unemployment issue? Contact us here.
The information contained in this article is not a substitute for legal advice or counsel and has been pulled from multiple sources.
Images by: Magnific
